THE NOW VIEW
The now view is one that views the unity of the faith as something that has the ability to be accomplished before this dispensation comes to a close. Although the future/now view has many valid points, as its argumentation unfolds it begins to take a future only view. The writer of this paper prefers a view that the unity of the faith, as stated in Ephesians 4:13, is an attainable goal. Attainable being something the church can arrive at. In his commentary The Glory of the Church, Homer Kent summarizes what will follow with wonderful grace:
Every believer…has a service to perform…the ministering by all believers, as they have been equipped by the gifts (of God) is intended to accomplish the building up of the church. The emphasis of the passage seems to be on spiritual life and its development…there is a unity of the faith already possessed by true believers (4:5), but there is also an experiential development of this faith as believers increase in spiritual capacity. This is closely connected with the Christians growth in knowledge of the Son of God…although absolute perfection is not achieved in this life, yet there is a relative maturity that is not only attainable but is expected of every believer…the church itself is called the fullness of Christ in 1:23. In 4:13 Paul speaks of Christ-likeness that every believer should display. The final achievement must await His coming, when we shall be like Him, but now there is a measure of this Christ-likeness that we should experience and demonstrate.[1]
Kent says very well that although the believer is in a continuous state of being sanctified, there is the ability to attain to the unity of the faith on the basis of God’s gifts of gifted people to His church.
When God gives gifts He does so perfectly. Everything He does is “good” as seen in the infant stage of creation in Genesis 1 and 2. If this is true, which it is, it would stand to reason that the purpose of the gifts of gifted men is for the perfecting of the saints for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ, till we all come in the unity of the faith (Eph. 4:12-13). Theologian Millard Erickson, commenting on the unity of the faith, says “one body refers to the church as the body of Christ. This body must be one since Christ is one, and Christ cannot be divided. Later in the chapter (speaking of Eph 4), Paul develops the idea of ministry, which has the purpose of building up the church in the one faith. This guarantees the unity initiated by the one Christ.”[2] The unity of the church is a theme that is sounded throughout the epistle to the Ephesians. This being the case, the now view is not too far-fetched.
The now view seems to have two parts to it. As mentioned above, Christ and His body is not divided, and in this sense there is already unity. This begs the question: why is the argument for unity to be not only maintained but a goal? According to Erickson, the image of the church as the bride will help determine the answer. From the beginning (Gen. 2:24) marriage is seen and intended to be monogamous. In Scripture marriage is never anything but one man and one woman. However the old nature flares up from time to time. Jesus, speaking on marriage and divorce, says that divorce only comes about because of the hard heart (Matt. 19:8). It would stand to reason that a hard heart will rear its ugly head on occasion within the body as the body awaits it final redemption. Nonetheless it is a unified body (now) that is troubled on occasion.
Having established the immediate purpose of gifted people given to the church, which is the building up of the body of Christ, Paul explains the need for the building up to continue until the measure of the fullness of Christ. The building up of the body seems to indicate the goal. Back to the verse at hand, Paul writes “until we all”, which sheds light on who is involved. The “all” goes back to the “saints” of verse 12, which is “because we are all being prepared for the work of the ministry with the goal of building up the body of Christ which we are all a part of”.[3] He goes on to say that there are three aspects of the one goal which Paul seems to present a stair-step attainment to the goal.[4] The goal is the unity of the faith (building of the body of Christ), the first stair-step attainment to this goal is “to the unity of the faith and the knowledge of the Son of God (Eph. 4:13a).” The effort is to preserve the unity just like in (4:3) where Paul exhorts believers to preserve the unity of the Spirit.[5] This is very helpful as preservation is only done on something that presently exists. In other words if the unity of the faith was not a reality then neither is its preservation.
In what Hoehner calls the first component of the goal, is also the knowledge of the Son of God. The word knowledge is interesting. It is epignwsiV. Strong’s defines it as “the complete comprehension after the first knowledge of a matter”[6] and Thayer’s says it is “the true knowledge of Christ’s nature, dignity and benefits”.[7] This seems to be a growing of knowledge, much like Paul who desired to know Christ better (Phi.3:10-14). He had already met the risen Christ, but he wanted to know more of him – experientially. Another example is Moses; nobody had walked with God since Adam, like Moses did. Yet Moses says (Exodus 33) that he desired to know God. It is knowledge in its fullest sense. The knowledge Paul is writing of in Ephesians 4:13, is not that the church would come to know Christ, they already do. Rather that experientially, the church individually and corporately would fall in deeper love with Christ through knowing Him more. Within this same vein Hoehner brings it closer to home saying “it must be asserted that such knowledge applies not only to individuals but to the body of believers who together come to a unity of the knowledge of Christ. This knowledge is not an abstract but a concrete knowledge of Christ (the bestower of gifts and gifted persons), which is the opposite of the deceitful doctrines…of (v. 14)”.[8] Concluding the first aspect of the goal; the unity of the faith and the unity of the knowledge of Christ must go together. A dynamic faith brings a dynamic knowledge of Christ, which produces more faith (also something that had to begin but can grow).[9]
The first aspect is to attain to the unity of the faith and the knowledge of the Son of God. The second statement leads to the next aspect in the goal which is to attain to a mature person. Commentators seem to disagree somewhat here. This is the place that distorts the various views (future only, future/now, and now). Kenneth Wuest in his popular and helpful Word Studies in the Greek New Testament says matter-of-fact that “the words ‘mature man’ refer to the individual believer. The apostle has in mind each individual saint.”[10] In agreement is Homer Kent who says in regards to Ephesians 4:13 that “the aim of such development in the Christian life is the acquiring of spiritual maturity. The ‘mature man’ is in contrast to an infant (v. 14). Although absolute perfection is not achieved in this life, yet there is a relative maturity that is not attainable but is expected of every believer.”[11] Again, if the position is taken that the “mature man” is the individual believer, then the case is closed. The individual believer will not arrive at the goal until Christ comes. However it is the position of the writer that it is not referring to the individual believer.
The second aspect of attaining to a mature person cannot “have the ethical sense of complete perfection (in its present context) since this only comes at the parousia”.[12] Understandably it is in contrast to the immature in verse 14, however it is not described in individual terms “but refers to the totality of believers as the body of Christ”[13] much like what is in 2:15. Hoehner elaborates deeper saying “the context as a whole talks about the body composed of individuals.[14] Paul in the present context is writing in the singular to refer to a collective body of believers. The “mature person” must then be speaking of the church. When the individual believer contributes by exercising, by faith, his God given gifts, the body as a whole can grow. In the context of Ephesians 4:13 it is the body of believers on earth who are seen as growing into maturity.[15]
It seems that Paul is building on the first two aspects mentioned above when he writes “to the measure of Christ’s full stature”. There is some difficulty with the word “measure” which is the Greek word h|likia. It denotes “age” in the Septuagint and in the New Testament on several occasions it refers to “physical stature”. O’Brien says that “stature” is more appropriate and Hoehner says that the word connotes “maturity” in the present context.[16] Although both can be synonyms “stature” seems to fit well, especially in the present context of the whole body, being that the church is already the fullness of Christ (Eph. 1:23; 4:10). His body is the fullness of Him!
CONCLUSION
In Ephesians 4:13, is Paul writing of a maturity that occurs presently or one that is eschatological? Many commentators and scholars take the position that this is a future aspect of maturity. This is much easier understood if one interprets the context as dealing with the individual believer. John Phillips seems to do this saying that “the ultimate goal will not be realized until the rapture when all individual members of the body of Christ will be glorified”.[17] This, however, is not the case because Paul does not have a time frame in mind. The potential “that it could occur in the present time is real, otherwise, there would be no need for gifts to be given to each believer for the building up of the church”.[18] The presupposition one should always have is that the work of Christ on the cross and the indwelling of the Holy Spirit is sufficient power to accomplish any task. The potential for a church to be fully mature is real or else Scripture offers false hope. The Lord is continually striving with His church and will continue until He comes for His bride. There are many forces at work that try (and are successful unfortunately) and make the church weak and impotent. Those include but are not limited to carnality, division, doctrinal impurity, immorality and so on. However, the goal is certainly achievable within the fellowship of any local church.
“Let us be glad and rejoice, and give honour to him; for the marriage of the Lamb is come, and his wife hath made herself ready.” Revelation 19:7
[1] Kent, Homer A. The Glory of the Church: Studies in Ephesians (Winona Lake: BMH, 1971), 74.
[2] Erickson, Millard. Christian Theology (Grand Rapids: Baker, 1998), 1139.
[3] Hoehner, Harold. Ephesians: An Exegetical Commentary, 552.
[4] Ibid., 553.
[5] Ibid., 553.
[6] Strong, James. Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible (Nashville: Nelson, 2001), 1922.
[7] Thayer, Joseph. Thayer’s Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament, 217.
[8] Hoehner, Harold. Ephesians: An Exegetical Commentary, 554.
[9] Ibid., 554. The writer paraphrases Hoehner. It is interesting that one doesn’t say that faith is eschatological, but rather one grows in the faith they already possess.
[10] Wuest, Kenneth. Word Studies in the Greek New Testament (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1980), 3006.
[11] Kent, Homer. The Glory of the Church: Studies in Ephesians, 74.
[12] Hoehner, Harold. Ephesians: An Exegetical Commentary, 555.
[13] O’Brien, Peter. The Letter to the Ephesians, 307.
[14] Hoehner, Harold. Ephesians: An Exegetical Commentary, 554.
[15] Ibid, 556.
[16] Hoehner, Harold. Ephesians: An Exegetical Commentary, 557. O’Brien, Peter. The Letter to the Ephesians, 307.
[17] Phillips, John. Exploring Ephesians and Philippians (Grand Rapids: Kregel, 1993), 120.
[18] Hoehner, Harold. Ephesians: An Exegetical Commentary, 558.